tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13493010.post115618389110783211..comments2011-10-05T17:55:15.171-04:00Pittsleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15701313028266975294noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13493010.post-1157033701693255892006-08-31T10:15:00.000-04:002006-08-31T10:15:00.000-04:00I'm glad to hear from you, pitchford. Your comments, asinine or not, are welcome any time.Pittsleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15701313028266975294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13493010.post-1156978378247228802006-08-30T18:52:00.000-04:002006-08-30T18:52:00.000-04:00I hope your prognosis is correct: I'd rather contend with Harry Potter than with Left Behind.<BR/><BR/>[Another asinine comment by Pitchford...]Pitchfordhttp://www.pitch.fitzage.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13493010.post-1156212810935562512006-08-21T22:13:00.000-04:002006-08-21T22:13:00.000-04:00I think the Potter series will be remembered for awhile. Rowling falls into some literary no-nos, but I think there's enough literary quality to be read by our grandchildren. I have little doubt it will last longer as literature than the Left Behind Series, though that might provide some historical interest.<BR/><BR/>The unfortunate thing about good literature is that nobody knows what's really good until 50 years after the fact.Pittsleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15701313028266975294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13493010.post-1156211512392229122006-08-21T21:51:00.000-04:002006-08-21T21:51:00.000-04:00Good call on what love is this . . . but ditch the Harry Potter tome.Luther's Steinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00662602280196411572noreply@blogger.com